MARATTO

review · Epidemiology and Infection

A systematic review and meta-analysis of ambient temperature and precipitation with infections from five food-borne bacterial pathogens

202413 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

Studies on climate variables and food pathogens are either pathogen- or region-specific, necessitating a consolidated view on the subject. This study aims to systematically review all studies on the association of ambient temperature and precipitation on the incidence of gastroenteritis and bacteraemia from <i>Salmonella</i>, <i>Shigella</i>, <i>Campylobacter</i>, <i>Vibrio</i>, and <i>Listeria</i> species. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 9 March 2023. We screened 3,204 articles for eligibility and included 83 studies in the review and three in the meta-analysis. Except for one study on <i>Campylobacter</i>, all showed a positive association between temperature and <i>Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio sp.</i>, and <i>Campylobacter</i> gastroenteritis. Similarly, most of the included studies showed that precipitation was positively associated with these conditions. These positive associations were found regardless of the effect measure chosen. The pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the three studies that included bacteraemia from <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella sp.</i> was 1.05 (95 per cent confidence interval (95% CI): 1.03, 1.06) for extreme temperature and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.19) for extreme precipitation. If current climate trends continue, our findings suggest these pathogens would increase patient morbidity, the need for hospitalization, and prolonged antibiotic courses.

Research topics

  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1017/s0950268824000839

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.