article · Data
The increasing volume of student assessments, particularly open-ended responses, presents a significant challenge for educators in ensuring grading accuracy, consistency, and efficiency. This paper presents a structured dataset designed for the development and evaluation of automated grading systems in higher education. The primary objective is to create a high-quality dataset that facilitates the development and evaluation of natural language processing (NLP) models for automated grading. The dataset comprises student responses to open-ended questions from the Management Information Systems (MIS221) and Project Management (MIS415) courses at Covenant University, collected during the 2022/2023 academic session. The responses were originally handwritten, scanned, and transcribed into Word documents. Each response is paired with corresponding scores assigned by human graders, following a detailed marking guide. To assess the dataset’s potential for automated grading applications, several machine learning and transformer-based models were tested, including TF-IDF with Linear Regression, TF-IDF with Cosine Similarity, BERT, SBERT, RoBERTa, and Longformer. The experimental results demonstrate that transformer-based models outperform traditional methods, with Longformer achieving the highest Spearman’s Correlation of 0.77 and the lowest Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.04, indicating a strong alignment between model predictions and human grading. The findings highlight the effectiveness of deep learning models in capturing the semantic and contextual meaning of both student responses and marking guides, making it possible to develop more scalable and reliable automated grading solutions. This dataset offers valuable insights into student performance and serves as a foundational resource for integrating educational technology into automated assessment systems. Future work will focus on enhancing grading consistency and expanding the dataset for broader academic applications.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/data10060087
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.