MARATTO

review · RSC Advances

A review on MOFs synthesis and effect of their structural characteristics for hydrogen adsorption

202457 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Nigeria

In plain language

Transitioning to sustainable clean energy like hydrogen is essential to combat climate change, yet practical storage remains a critical barrier to widespread adoption. Existing physical storage methods, including liquefied and compressed hydrogen, fail to satisfy United States Department of Energy performance targets for on-board vehicle applications. Solid-state, material-based approaches provide an alternative pathway. Metal-organic frameworks have emerged as promising candidates for energy storage owing to their high pore volumes, large surface areas, and adjustable structural designs. Various advanced synthesis techniques, including solvothermal, mechanochemical, microwave-assisted, and sonochemical approaches, enable the fabrication of these crystalline porous materials. Examining these construction routes alongside the structural parameters and physical factors of metal-organic frameworks reveals key relationships that govern hydrogen adsorption capacity.

Key takeaways

  • Conventional storage methods such as liquefied and compressed hydrogen struggle to satisfy performance targets for on-board use.
  • Metal-organic frameworks provide a material-based storage alternative characterised by large surface areas, high pore volumes, and tunable structures.
  • Common production routes for these porous materials include solvothermal, mechanochemical, microwave-assisted, and sonochemical synthesis.
  • Specific structural characteristics directly govern the ultimate hydrogen adsorption capacity of metal-organic frameworks.

Why it matters

Hydrogen offers significant potential as a zero-emission alternative to fossil fuels, but storing sufficient quantities safely and compactly remains a major technical obstacle. Identifying porous solid materials capable of holding hydrogen efficiently could enable practical storage systems for clean transport and industry, supporting broader international efforts to reduce carbon emissions and tackle climate change.

Commercialisation angle

The insights apply to materials developers and engineers working on hydrogen fuel storage systems for on-board transport. By examining synthesis routes such as microwave-assisted and mechanochemical methods alongside capacity-limiting factors, the work informs the design of solid-state storage media. However, because the abstract describes a review of synthesis techniques and structural characteristics rather than a scaled or deployed device, the technology sits at an early stage of materials research.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Climate change is causing a rise in the need to transition from fossil fuels to renewable and clean energy such as hydrogen as a sustainable energy source. The issue with hydrogen's practical storage, however, prevents it from being widely used as an energy source. Current solutions, such as liquefied and compressed hydrogen storage, are insufficient to meet the U.S. Department of Energy's (US DOE) extensive on-board application requirements. Thus, a backup strategy involving material-based storage is required. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) belong to the category of crystalline porous materials that have seen rapid interest in the field of energy storage due to their large surface area, high pore volume, and modifiable structure. Therefore, advanced technologies employed in the construction of MOFs, such as solvothermal, mechanochemical, microwave assisted, and sonochemical methods are reviewed. Finally, this review discussed the selected factors and structural characteristics of MOFs, which affect the hydrogen capacity.

Research topics

  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1039/d4ra00865k

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.