review · African Journal Of Applied Research
Purpose: This empirical study, based on Routine Activity Theory (RAT), aimed to explore the drivers behind environmental harm, the factors that contribute to the suitability of the environment as a target for ecological harm, and the strategies for promoting sustainability in Ghana's textiles industry Design/ Methodology/ Approach: Interpretive phenomenology was employed alongside a descriptive research design to achieve this. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 25 textile designers for semi-structured interviews. The collected data were then processed using NVivo 12.1 and analysed thematically through interpretative phenomenological analysis, facilitating the identification of recurring themes, patterns, and insights. Research Limitation: The study's emphasis on a specific group of participants within the Ghanaian textile industry restricts the generalizability of our findings. Findings: The study identified several fundamental motivating factors driving environmentally harmful practices, including a profit-driven mindset, the market demand for textile fabric, limited awareness and education, resource constraints, and cultural and aesthetic preferences. Practical Implications: Interventions in the textiles industry to address economic, educational, and resource-related challenges can be accomplished through various methods to promote sustainable practices. Social Implications: The research findings underscore the importance of establishing industry-wide sustainability standards that prioritise responsible sourcing, environmental conservation, and transparency to ensure that the textile sector's operations align with environmental preservation. Originality and Value: The study contributed to the vast of knowledge on how textiles affect the environment and sustainability measures. Keywords: Ecological crimes. environmental impact. motivated offenders. sustainability strategies. textile fabric
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.26437/ajar.v11i2.1040
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.