MARATTO

review · Bioengineering

A Review of 3D Polymeric Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Principles, Fabrication Techniques, Immunomodulatory Roles, and Challenges

2023157 citationsOpen accessBritish University in Egypt

In plain language

Biopolymers offer diverse chemical, mechanical, and physical properties that make them central to the fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Both synthetic and natural polymeric materials provide structural frameworks that incorporate biological macromolecules tailored for bone repair. Manufacturing techniques span conventional methods, such as freeze-drying, electrospinning, gas foaming, thermally induced phase separation, sol-gel processes, and solvent casting combined with particle leaching. Advanced additive manufacturing approaches, including stereolithography, fused deposition modelling, selective laser sintering, and three-dimensional bioprinting, offer distinct features compared to subtractive manufacturing. Polymeric scaffolds also play critical immunomodulatory roles during bone healing. However, translating these scaffold-based therapies into clinical practice involves significant technical and biological challenges.

Key takeaways

  • Biopolymers possess versatile chemical, mechanical, and physical properties suited for bone tissue engineering scaffolds.
  • Scaffold fabrication relies on both conventional techniques like electrospinning and freeze-drying, as well as additive methods like bioprinting and stereolithography.
  • Additive manufacturing provides distinct advantages and challenges when compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing methods.
  • Polymeric scaffolds serve immunomodulatory functions that influence bone regeneration outcomes.
  • Significant practical hurdles remain before scaffold-based therapies can be widely applied in clinical settings.

Why it matters

Bone damage from trauma, disease, or ageing often requires advanced regenerative therapies to restore skeletal function. Three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds provide artificial structures that guide new bone growth while interacting favourably with the immune system. Understanding fabrication methods and biological interactions helps researchers address the practical hurdles that prevent laboratory tissue engineering discoveries from successfully treating patients.

Commercialisation angle

The work relates to bone tissue engineering therapies and advanced biomaterial manufacturing, targeting biomedical device developers, orthopaedic clinicians, and tissue engineers. As a broad overview detailing manufacturing techniques from electrospinning to additive bioprinting alongside practical translation hurdles, it indicates an early- to intermediate-stage research landscape where manufacturing standards and implementation challenges must be resolved before widespread routine clinical use.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Over the last few years, biopolymers have attracted great interest in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine due to the great diversity of their chemical, mechanical, and physical properties for the fabrication of 3D scaffolds. This review is devoted to recent advances in synthetic and natural polymeric 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) and regenerative therapies. The review comprehensively discusses the implications of biological macromolecules, structure, and composition of polymeric scaffolds used in BTE. Various approaches to fabricating 3D BTE scaffolds are discussed, including solvent casting and particle leaching, freeze-drying, thermally induced phase separation, gas foaming, electrospinning, and sol-gel techniques. Rapid prototyping technologies such as stereolithography, fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, and 3D bioprinting are also covered. The immunomodulatory roles of polymeric scaffolds utilized for BTE applications are discussed. In addition, the features and challenges of 3D polymer scaffolds fabricated using advanced additive manufacturing technologies (rapid prototyping) are addressed and compared to conventional subtractive manufacturing techniques. Finally, the challenges of applying scaffold-based BTE treatments in practice are discussed in-depth.

Research topics

  • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020204

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.