article · Drug Design Development and Therapy
Background: The therapeutic potential of nifuroxazide in colitis has been explored in several experimental studies of ulcerative colitis (UC). Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of nifuroxazide in patients with UC. Methods: Fifty patients with mild to moderate UC were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 25 each). The placebo group received a placebo alongside mesalamine (1 g three times daily [t.i.d.]) for six months. The nifuroxazide group received nifuroxazide (200 mg twice daily) in combination with mesalamine (1 g t.i.d). A gastroenterologist assessed disease severity using the partial Mayo score (PMS). Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) were measured before and after treatment. Quality of life was evaluated using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32). Primary outcomes: Change in PMS. Secondary outcomes: change in IBDQ-32 and in the level of measured biomarkers. Results: Baseline measurements were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Post-treatment values showed significant improvements within both groups compared to baseline. However, the nifuroxazide group demonstrated significantly greater improvements than the placebo group, including reductions in PMS (p = 0.005) and increases in IBDQ scores (p = 0.002). Additionally, significant decreases were observed in IL-6 (p = 0.03), NF-κB (p = 0.03), CRP (p = 0.02), and STAT3 (p = 0.03) levels. The placebo group had a response rate of 56% (14/25) and a remission rate of 24% (6/25), whereas the nifuroxazide group achieved a response rate of 76% (19/25) and a remission rate of 56% (14/25), based on PMS. Conclusion: Co-administration of nifuroxazide with mesalamine improved clinical outcomes, including higher response and remission rates, reduced inflammation by reducing IL-6/STAT3, and enhanced quality of life in patients with UC, compared to mesalamine alone. Trial Registration Identifier: NCT05988528.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s522755
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.