MARATTO

article · BMJ Global Health

A pragmatic covariate-constrained cluster-randomised controlled trial of hybrid parents and health workers adaptive intervention for optimal (timely, cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage: the AGINTOPIC trial

20251 citationOpen accessEbonyi State University

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-preventable infectious diseases (VPDs) covered by routine childhood immunisation programmes are major causes of morbidity/mortality as outbreaks continue to reoccur despite repeated efforts to increase immunisation coverage. This trial aimed at increasing optimal/timely immunisation coverage. METHODS: The Adaptive Group Intervention for Optimal routine childhood Immunisation Coverage (AGINTOPIC) trial was conducted from 1 June 2022 to 31 May 2023 in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. 16 geographical clusters (where the primary healthcare facilities were providing weekly routine childhood immunisation) were covariate-constrained-randomised (1:1) to control arm (receiving no intervention) and intervention arm (receiving hybrid parents/health workers adaptive engagement to enlighten/facilitate regular communications/working relationships between them regarding optimal immunisation). The primary outcomes included the proportion of children aged 5-9 months who had optimal/timely (cumulative age-appropriate) receipt of every recommended birth to 14 weeks vaccine and the age-appropriate vaccines receipt (receipt timeliness) score. The outcomes were measured via baseline and end-of-study repeated cross-sectional surveys. All analyses were done using a cluster-level method on intention-to-treat basis, and randomisation-based inference was done via adjusted clustered permutation tests (aCPTs) to check the robustness/validity of the main findings. RESULTS: A mean proportion of 6.0% (SD 8.1) of children aged 5-9 months in the control arm had optimal/timely receipt of every recommended birth to 14 weeks vaccine, vs 14.3% (11.7) in the intervention arm (adjusted prevalence difference 10.8%, 95% CI 0.8% to 20.9%, p=0.0376, aCPT p=0.0093). The mean age-appropriate vaccines receipt score was 75.1 (17.8) in the control arm, vs 85.5 (9.5) in the intervention arm (adjusted mean difference 9.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.9, p=0.0317, aCPT p=0.0155). CONCLUSIONS: The AGINTOPIC intervention significantly increased the optimal/timely (cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage, and the evidence illuminates the need for the exploration and adaptation of such pragmatic/dynamic/scalable community engagement intervention by routine childhood immunisation programmes in the global efforts to address the recurrent outbreaks of VPDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN59811905.

Research topics

  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017403

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.