MARATTO

article · Quantum Information Processing

A hardware-efficient Mølmer–Sørensen gate for superconducting quantum computers

2026Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Abstract The Mølmer–Sørensen gate, a cornerstone entangling operation in trapped-ion systems, represents a promising alternative to standard entangling gates in superconducting quantum architectures. However, its performance on superconducting hardware has remained unverified. In this work, we present a hardware-efficient implementation of the Mølmer–Sørensen gate and characterize its performance using quantum process tomography (QPT) on IBM Quantum’s superconducting processors. Our implementation achieves a process fidelity of 92.47% on the real quantum hardware, a performance competitive with the 93.02% fidelity of the device’s native controlled-NOT (CX) gate. Furthermore, for the $$\vert {00} \rangle $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mn>00</mml:mn> <mml:mo>⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> input state, the gate prepares the target Bell state with $$94.2\%$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>94.2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> success probability, confirming its correct logical operation. These results demonstrate that non-native entangling gates can be optimized to perform on par with hardware-native operations. This work expands the effective gate set for algorithm design on fixed-architecture processors and provides a critical benchmark for cross-platform gate evaluation, underscoring the role of hardware-aware compilation in advancing noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing.

Research topics

  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s11128-026-05167-4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.