MARATTO

article · Next Materials

A finite element method for analyzing the free vibration of tapered functionally graded porous (FGMP) arches with point masses

2026Open accessMohammed V University

Abstract

This study examines the linear free vibration of a linearly tapered circular arch made of functionally graded porous material and carrying a concentrated mass at an arbitrary curvilinear location. Both uniform and non-uniform through-thickness porosity distributions are considered. A conventional two-node Euler-Bernoulli finite-element model is used to combine tapering, material gradation, porosity-dependent section properties, and direct nodal assembly of the attached mass; no enriched or generalized finite-element formulation is introduced. Because transverse shear deformation and rotary inertia are neglected, the model is intended for slender arches. Hamilton's principle yields a standard symmetric generalized eigenvalue problem, which is solved with a direct eigensolver. The formulation is assessed through mesh convergence, limiting cases, and comparison with a published clamped-clamped FGM arch benchmark. Over the range studied, the natural frequencies decrease as either the taper coefficient or the power-law index increases. The response to the attached mass depends on the modal displacement at its location, with the largest effect near an antinode and a negligible effect near a node. Porosity causes smaller, model-dependent changes: uniform porosity lowers the frequencies, whereas the adopted non-uniform distribution may produce a slight increase because the pores are concentrated near the neutral axis. In all cases, the porosity-induced shifts remain within a few percent and should not be regarded as a universal design rule.

Research topics

  • Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
  • Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
  • Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.103220

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.