article · Agricultural Water Management
Efficient irrigation management in semi-arid sugarcane systems requires diagnostic tools that can distinguish whether changes in water productivity arise from increased consumptive water use or reduced crop response. This study applied a dual-model remote sensing framework integrating Landsat-based PySEBAL and FAO WaPOR to assess seasonal biomass production, actual evapotranspiration, and water productivity at Kasinthula Cane Growers Limited, a 1,475-ha irrigated sugarcane scheme in southern Malawi, during the 2019 and 2020 seasons. PySEBAL was used for block-scale diagnostics, while WaPOR provided an independent scheme-scale benchmark. PySEBAL-derived biomass increased from 50 t ha⁻¹ in 2019–64 t ha⁻¹ in 2020, compared with field-measured yields of 36 and 59 t ha⁻¹ , respectively. Agreement between PySEBAL and field observations was moderate to strong, with R² values of 0.74 in 2019 and 0.68 in 2020. Inter-model comparison between PySEBAL and WaPOR biomass was also strong, with R² values of 0.88 and 0.80 for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Despite higher biomass in 2020, mean water productivity declined from 5.2 to 4.1 kg m⁻³ , indicating that increased water consumption did not generate proportional yield gains. Spatial analysis further showed expansion of high actual evapotranspiration but low-water-productivity zones in 2020.The results show that integrating PySEBAL and WaPOR improves irrigation performance diagnostics by combining fine-scale spatial discrimination with broader benchmarking capacity. The framework supports irrigation scheduling refinement, identification of low-performing blocks, and prioritization of targeted interventions in water-scarce commercial sugarcane systems. • Integrated PySEBAL and WaPOR to triangulate irrigation performance. • Interannual AET increase reduced water productivity despite higher biomass. • Spatial diagnostics identified blocks with non-proportional yield–water gains. • Remote sensing distinguished productive from inefficient water use. • Framework supports scheduling optimization and water allocation decisions.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110363
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.