MARATTO

article · Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering

A critical and bibliometric review of life cycle cost analysis integration into decision support systems for pipeline asset integrity management

20252 citationsOpen accessAbubakar Tafawa Balewa University

Abstract

• Maintaining pipeline integrity is essential for safety, environmental protection, and energy security. • Traditional pipeline management is reactive, leading to high costs, safety risks, and inefficiencies. • Life Cycle Cost Analysis-based Decision Support Systems (LCCA-DSS) improve pipeline management by optimizing costs and risks. • There is limited research on integrating LCCA and DSS for pipeline integrity, highlighting a major gap. • North America leads research in this field, while South America and Africa have minimal contributions. Pipelines play an important role in the worldwide oil and gas industry, allowing hydrocarbons to be transported over long distances. Maintaining their integrity is critical to environmental preservation, energy security, and community safety. Traditional pipeline assets management has been mainly reactive, addressing faults after they occur, resulting in inefficiencies, safety issues, and increased costs. The challenges are worsened by aging pipeline infrastructure, emphasizing the importance of a proactive approach throughout the pipeline’s life cycle. Life Cycle Cost Analysis-Based Decision Support Systems (LCCA-DSS) provide a novel solution that combines advanced data analytics, risk assessment, and optimization algorithms. By taking into consideration the cost of construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning, these systems enable proactive decision-making. A bibliometric review using Elsevier’s Scopus and Web of Science databases found extensive research activities on DSS with 127,719 and 14,450 documents identified respectively. Similarly, and LCCA has 3,951 documents in Scopus and 2,128 in web of science. However, only 77 documents in Scopus and 5 Web of science addressed the integration of LCCA and DSS. Regarding DSS and pipeline integrity management, 29 documents were found in Scopus, while none in Web of science. Likewise, integration of LCCA and pipeline integrity management revealed only one document in Scopus and none in web of science at the time the data was collected. Indicating a limited research effort in this domain. The Study reveal that North America, Europe and Asia are the main contributors, with the United State leading with 19 contributions, followed by Canada with 14, and China with 10, while South America and Africa are the regions that shows minimal research activity in this field. By integrating LCCA-based DSS into reality, pipeline asset integrity management will be transformed, and oil and gas infrastructure will have a reliable, economical, and sustainable future. Based on this, a comprehensive LCCA-based DSS framework was developed, it is anticipated that the implementation of this framework can increase pipeline management effectiveness, lower costs, and improve safety by addressing technical, financial, and operational challenges. Moreover, more research is required, since this study highlights the gaps in the current body of knowledge.

Research topics

  • Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
  • Offshore Engineering and Technologies
  • Transportation Systems and Infrastructure

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100307

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.