article · International Journal of Linguistics Studies
This study conducts a comparative analysis of passivization in English and French, focusing on their structural features and formation rules. Key differences, such as agreement patterns and agent expression, are shown to significantly influence both syntactic theory and language pedagogy. The analysis demonstrates that features like participle agreement in French and agent omission in English have direct implications for language acquisition and instructional strategies. Comparative analysis is therefore essential for advancing both theoretical understanding and practical application. Drawing on empirical data and student perspectives, this research identifies patterns and distinctions not addressed in foundational studies, including Siewierska (1984) and Péry-Woodley (2008), and connects grammatical structures to specific educational outcomes. The findings indicate that awareness of cross-linguistic distinctions can enhance curriculum design and inform targeted interventions for linguists, educators, and curriculum developers.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32996/ijls.2026.6.2.4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
