article · Polymers
The point-stress criterion (PSC) offers a practical approach for predicting the notched strength of polymer composites, but its reliance on an empirically fitted characteristic length d0 limits its predictive generality. This study presents a physics-based modification of the Srivastava-style PSC, where d0 is derived directly from the fracture process zone (FPZ) length obtained from cohesive zone modeling, eliminating the need for geometry-dependent empirical fitting of d0 while requiring only a single calibration of constants C and k using a reference geometry. These constants remain fixed for all subsequent predictions across different hole sizes and specimen widths. A unified computational framework implementing constant and linear traction-separation laws is developed within a MATLAB environment. The optimal FPZ length is determined from the stationary point of the R-curve (dσN/dl=0), subject to a critical crack opening displacement cutoff. The framework is validated against comprehensive experimental data for a Glass/Epoxy laminate (σu=351.4 MPa) across a wide range of hole radii (0.3-20 mm) and specimen widths (10, 20, 40 mm). Results demonstrate that the constant cohesive law significantly outperforms the linear law, achieving an overall prediction accuracy of 84.7% (15.3% mean error) with an optimal FPZ length lopt=2.3 mm. The linear law yields slightly lower accuracy (82.9%, lopt=3.0 mm), while the exponential law is unsuitable for this quasi-brittle system. The proposed framework successfully captures size effects and finite-width dependence without empirical fitting of d0. By linking the characteristic length directly to cohesive zone mechanics, this work provides a robust, physically consistent, and predictive extension of the PSC for engineering design of notched polymer composite structures.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/polym18101148
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.