MARATTO

article · Discover Sustainability

A case study of patriarchy and girls educational exclusion in tribal Balochistan

2025Open access

Abstract

Despite its endorsement as a universal right under SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality), girls in rural Balochistan remain systematically excluded from schooling by entrenched tribal norms and patriarchal capital that channel resources toward male education. An interpretive qualitative case study was conducted in Barkhan district. Thirty-six participants were purposively sampled: ten out-of-school girls (ages 10–16), ten parents (six mothers, four fathers), four extended family members, four tribal leaders, four teachers (two female, two male), and four NGO workers. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Three interlocking barriers were identified: marriage before age 15, which abruptly terminates girls’ schooling; heavy domestic labor obligations that leave insufficient time and energy for education; and a chronic shortage of female teachers, compounded by honour-code sanctions that deter families from sending daughters to male-staffed schools. Applying Patriarchal Theory frameworks of social and cultural capital reveals how male authority across households, tribal councils, and educational institutions perpetuates girls’ exclusion at individual, familial, and community levels. To advance SDG 4 and SDG 5, culturally grounded strategies are essential: recruiting and training local female educators to redress classroom gender imbalances; strengthening financial and community support networks such as scholarships, conditional cash transfers, and dialogue circles to ease both economic and social barriers; and implementing gender-sensitive policy reforms to dismantle entrenched patriarchal capital within tribal education systems.

Research topics

  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Religious Education and Schools

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s43621-025-01552-8

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.