MARATTO

article · Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

A Case of Metastatic Vulvar Choriocarcinoma Misdiagnosed as Vulvar Abscess: A Case Report

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Metastatic vulvar choriocarcinoma, a rare ectopic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), often presents a diagnostic challenge due to its mimicry of other conditions, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its primary symptom is abnormal vaginal bleeding without a clear cause. Consequently, diagnosing and managing it poses difficulties for many low-resource health facilities, as evidenced by the current case. <b>Case Presentation:</b> We present the case of a 25-year-old, P2+2+2L2, who had a large painless, bleeding vulva mass for nearly 5 months. This followed a spontaneous abortion the month prior. The mass gradually increased in size and was accompanied by fever, pus discharge, and weight loss. Despite being treated at multiple health facilities for a vulvar abscess, there was no improvement. A diagnosis was finally made at a tertiary facility where elevated quantitative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (<i>β</i>-hCG) was noted. Due to uncontrollable vulva bleeding, she was referred to another tertiary facility for emergency radiotherapy. Following stabilization, chemotherapy was administered using the EMA-CO protocol. <b>Conclusion:</b> The report highlights the difficulty in diagnosing vulvar choriocarcinoma, underscoring the importance of a high index of suspicion. Clinical tests such as serum (<i>β</i>-hCG) and imaging studies are crucial for diagnosis. In resource-limited settings, a simple strip-based urine pregnancy test with serial dilutions can be sufficient for diagnosing and managing vulvar choriocarcinoma.

Research topics

  • Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1155/2024/9918452

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.