MARATTO

article · Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports

A Bayesian Framework for Estimating the Shape Parameter of an Exponential Poisson-lindley Distribution

2026Open accessUniversity of Abuja

Abstract

A Bayesian analysis of the shape parameter of an Exponential Poisson Lindley Distribution (ExPLinD) is presented in this study. This study examined the Bayesian estimation of the shape parameters of an ExPLinD using both informative and non-informative priors. Uniform and Jeffrey Priors were used as informative priors, while a gamma prior was adopted as a non-informative prior. These priors were combined with different error loss functions (Squared Error Loss Function (SELF), Precautionary Loss Function (PLF) and Quadratic Loss Function (QLF)) to allow for the possibility of different combinations and scenarios of prior and loss function that produced the best estimate of the shape parameter of an ExPLinD. Simulation study was conducted using Mean Squared Errors (MSE) as a metric, the Quadratic loss function produced the best estimator of the shape parameter of an ExPLinD compared to estimates from the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), SELF and PLF having the lowest estimated value of this metric except for when α is increased from 0.7 to 3.7 and “a” is increased from 1.0 to 3.5, where the PLF under Gamma prior presented less MSE than the QLF. The result also revealed that the values of the other parameters have no effect on the estimators of the shape parameter, as changing the values of these other parameters alone does not affect the MSE. This makes the QLF the best loss function to be used in obtaining a Bayesian estimate of an ExPLinD, as it will have minimal influence on inference to be made.

Research topics

  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.9734/ajarr/2026/v20i41337

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.